Nate Marquardt interview
Ever since losing a title shot to Anderson Silva at UFC 73 back in July of last year, Nate “The Great” Marquardt (26-8-2) has been looking to get back into title contention. He welcomed Jeremy Horn back to the UFC with a guillotine choke submission at UFC 81 in February.

And he looked … um, “Great” in a well-publicized UFC 85 bout with Thales Leites.

The only problem is that he lost the fight thanks to two separate point deductions — an illegal knee to the head in the second round, and in the third, an elbow to the back of the head — the latter of which was probably erroneous. The decision was split, and the victor Leites threw his arms up in celebration for a fight he theoretically lost.

This presents an interesting question. On the UFC’s middleweight “depth chart,” how far do you drop Marquardt for losing a fight he really won, and how far do you raise Leites’ stock? Or do you at all?

To keep climbing that chart, Marquardt must first get past the dangerous Martin “Hitman” Kampmann (13-1), who’s fresh off his own UFC 85 win over Jorge Rivera and on a nice nine-fight win streak. To make it 10 it all goes down this Saturday, September 6, at UFC 88: “Breakthrough” at the Philips Arena in Atlanta, Georgia.

We caught up with Marquardt when he was training at his High Altitude Martial Arts academy in Aurora, Colo. Marquardt splits time between there, Greg Jackson’s Gaidojutsu mixed martial arts team in Albuquerque, N.M., and with UFC Welterweight Champion Georges St. Pierre up at BTT Canada and Tristar Gym in Montreal.

Adam Wagner (MMAmania.com): Your split decision loss to Thales Leites has got to be a bitter pill to swallow. How do you feel about the two points that you were docked, the second of which looked unjustified?

Nate Marquardt: Yeah, you know, it’s not as bad as it seems to be honest. That fight got me a lot of publicity. Everyone who saw the fight said that I won. So it’s not really like I really lost that fight.

Yeah, I thought the second point deduction … I don’t feel like what I did was illegal, but sometimes that happens in fights. To be honest, I think I could have finished Thales, and that was my fault for not keeping on him at a couple of points in that fight.

Adam Wagner (MMAmania.com): I read that after the fight, Leites didn’t want to grant you an immediate rematch. Is that true?

Nate Marquardt: Yes. We asked Joe Silva immediately after, and he said that Thales didn’t want a rematch.

Adam Wagner (MMAmania.com): Do you think he was trying to dodge you?

Nate Marquardt: I don’t know. It’s the smarter decision on his part. He ran away with the win on his record. And he’s looking to get a title shot, so it would be a smart choice on his part.

Adam Wagner (MMAmania.com): So is it difficult to bounce back from something like this, or are you looking at it as a win … or at least not a loss?

Nate Marquardt: Yeah, exactly. I see some mistakes I made during that fight, and I always try to work on that. I just try to get better after every fight. I’m not trying to look at it as a win or as a loss. I’m just trying to look at it and see what I did right, and try to copy that, and see what I did wrong and try to fix it.

Adam Wagner (MMAmania.com): Well you’re now set to face Martin Kampmann at UFC 88 this Saturday. Kampmann is a hard-nosed kick-boxer. He has a few submission wins under his belt. Although he’s stated that he’s unable to pinpoint a weakness on you, he also has said that he thinks his striking is superior to yours. How do you feel about the matchup?

Nate Marquardt: I feel great about it. He’s definitely a tough guy. He’s well rounded. He doesn’t have any big holes in his game at all. But I definitely feel that I’m going to be the dominant fighter, wherever the fight goes.

Adam Wagner (MMAmania.com): You’re one of the biggest guys at 185, while Kampmann is on the smaller end of the division. Do you see size being a major factor in this fight?

Nate Marquardt: Yeah, well not so much size, but definitely I feel that I’m going to be the stronger and the faster fighter.

Adam Wagner (MMAmania.com): So what happens in a situation where the fight hits the ground? What do you see happening there?

Nate Marquardt: I think I’m going to hit him as hard as I can and try to knock him out. I’m going to try to hurt him, make him make a mistake or knock him out.

Adam Wagner (MMAmania.com): You had mentioned on your blog that you think a win over Kampmann should solidify you as the number one contender. Do you think the loss to Leites, in the UFC’s eyes, could hinder your chances for the next title shot?

Nate Marquardt: No, not really. They obviously know what happened in the fight. They know that Thales is a tough fighter. They know how I fought with him. After this fight, they’ll see that I beat a guy that beat him, so I don’t think it’s going to come back to haunt me at all.

Adam Wagner (MMAmania.com): I wanted to ask you about how you’ve been training for Kampmann. Has this camp been any different than how you’ve trained in previous camps?

Nate Marquardt: Well barring the fact that I have to fight on six weeks notice, all my previous fights I think I’ve had around three months. So, we’ve had to speed everything up. But that’s not a big deal. I used to fight over in Japan in Pancrase, where you usually only have about six weeks — four to eight weeks was pretty average to know who my opponent was and things like that.

I was still in shape from my last fight, and I have a great strength and conditioning coach in John Chambers, and he’s got me ready for this fight.

Adam Wagner (MMAmania.com): You had also mentioned on your blog that you were training with Rashad Evans and Keith Jardine down in New Mexico, as well as with GSP up in Montreal. Is it common for you to travel around that much to train leading up to a fight?

Nate Marquardt: Yeah. I do a lot of my training here in Denver and down in Albuquerque and Montreal as well. I kinda bounce around in between places.

Adam Wagner (MMAmania.com): Can you tell us a bit about how this strategy helps improve your overall fight game?

Nate Marquardt: For one, we’re from different places, but we’re all teammates, so we’re all helping each other out. I think that’s really important. It’s actually a good thing that we’re located in different areas, because in New Mexico, the guys that live down there are constantly working with Mike Winkeljohn, the kickboxing trainer down there. They’re working with Greg Jackson. They have Mike VanArsdale, they have a lot of great coaches down there.

And guys up in Montreal, they’re working with guys like John Chambers, our strength and conditioning coach. They’re working with Phil Nurse, who is actually from New York, who is a Muay Thai coach with the wrestling club up there, working with high-level, world-class wrestlers.

I have the same thing here. I have my boxing coach Trevor Whitman, I have some really good wrestling coaches, like Keith Wilson. I have my jiu-jitsu guys that I go with from my gym and from Boulder. You know we have a good gym here as well.

It’s good to be located in different areas, because you’re going to learn different things depending on where you’re at. When I go to Montreal I get to learn their stuff, when I go down to New Mexico, I get to learn their stuff, and vice versa.

Adam Wagner (MMAmania.com): You also mentioned that you were filming some kind of pilot for a reality show. Can you tell us more about that?

Nate Marquardt: Oh yeah. That was like a month or six weeks ago. They were down in Albuquerque filming a pilot for a reality show, but to be honest, I don’t really know when it’s going to air or what it’s going to be or anything. I just know it’s going to be about some of the guys on the team. But if I hear more I’ll put it up on my blog.

Adam Wagner (MMAmania.com): Okay, so it’s some sort of MMA-related reality show.

Nate Marquardt: Yeah, definitely.

Adam Wagner (MMAmania.com): Okay, Nate, thanks a lot for talking with us. Would you like to thank any sponsors?

Nate Marquardt: Cool. I just want to thank all my coaches, all the gyms I train at, and all my sponsors, especially TapouT. And you can check out my website at NateMarquardt.com.

September 4th, 2008    

RSS feed | Trackback URI

44 Comments »

Comment by PhilQNY
2008-09-04 08:06:23

King of Champions: Anderson Silva

The rest of the UFC MW Division:

Patrick Cote

Chris Leben

Kampmann

McFredries

Nate Quarry

Pete Sell

Leites

Almeida

Bisping

Grove

Marquardt

Franklin?? 185? 205?

Henderson

Toquinho

The MW and LW division’s should jsut come up with a 1# contender’s belt.

Comment by The Dude
2008-09-04 08:28:20

LOL #1 contender belt, so true!

Comment by mikeybear
2008-09-04 08:30:11

as long as the ufc keeps making dream fights, it’s all good. anderson silva will get beat, just not in our life time

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by UFCAddict
2008-09-04 08:29:37

I agree with the contender’s belt at MW. There would be a lot of good fights there: Franklin vs. Hendo vs. Marquardt, etc… But I wouldn’t want one for the LW division to watch Sherk lay n’ pray for 5 rounds on top of people. I prefer to watch Penn fight at LW. However, BadASS (Anderson Spider Silva) would be more fun to watch compete with the LHWs.

 
Comment by PhilQNY
2008-09-04 08:46:08

Patrick Cote is getting his shot at Deathwish 9.0 in Chi town

Bisping upon him beatin Captian Misrable.. and I foret the other guy.. but if he gets passed Leben.. have him face off against Dan Henderson, Nate Quarry, or Leites.. to see him fight the upper half of the MW ladder.

I would like to see Mcfredies vs Sell.. and Sell needs to work his Serra Jiujitsu..I have not seen it since he tapped Baroni in the 3rd ..ages ago.. but I think these to “bangers’ can make a good show.. and who wins gets out the sub level floor of the Mw’s

Franklin?? Who knows.. he might reconsider dropping back down if he faces a Lyoto again.. or Wandy.. like my boy mentioned in an earlier thread.. keep ChuteBox guys away from Franklin.

Nate and Kampmann is an interesting fight.. I like Kampmann in this fight.. but it’s anyone ones guess till this Saturday night.

I forgot Maia.. oh.. this guy has the the jits to beat Silva.. “IF” he can get passed the Thai Clinch.. ” IF “”.

Almedia should be fighing either in a rematch with Marqaurdt in the near future…or Kendall Grove to see what’s good.

Nate Quarry?? This guy is true a remarkable fighter.. hopefully he can get a good named fighter..that can help get him up the ladder.. even though with Silva around.. he has 0000.00000.01% of being Champ.. but I like Nate Q.

Henderson and Toquinho…humm.. I feel bad for Toquinho. Iwould like for him to win.. my brazilian homey.. but damn .to fight a Dan Henderson coming off of two straight lossesd to two Champions.. Ah man.. he is going to be pissed. This andthe Nate fight is what got me a tad bit intrested in UFC88.. oh..and the countdown was pretty good.. The hammil story was good…and his wifey IS HOT!.. props to Hammil.

Comment by UKmmaBOY
2008-09-04 08:55:16

The other fighter Bisping fought was Jason Day.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by PhilQNY
2008-09-04 09:23:53

Thanks for the info.UKmmaBoy..you are one of the very few that can name who the ” Former top LHW Contender..Bisping ” per Dana.. fought in his last MW fight.

 
Comment by UKmmaBOY
2008-09-04 09:30:07

LOL. Gotta keep the Bisping bandwagon rolling!!

 
Comment by b.w.
2008-09-04 11:35:18

PHIL. sell is moving down to ww, but a fight vs he and drew would be an entertaining fight.

 
Comment by john
2008-09-04 11:57:34

Phil: As much as I like Hendo, he is going down at the hands of Palhares.

WAR BISPING~!

 
 
Comment by Toms Bombs
2008-09-04 12:40:22

You guys watch, Maia will be the one to eventually beat Anderson. You’ll see.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by James S
2008-09-04 18:24:39

I wasn’t super impressed with him in the mcdonald fight. He attempted some subs, but was having trouble with J-Mac’s defense. If Maia/ Silva were to happen, I think he would have a difficult time subbing Silva after being stunned by an A silva jab. Will have a better idea of maia’s capabilities after a few more fights.

 
 
Comment by DB
2008-09-04 17:58:51

Phil, Pete Sell has moved to welterweight and will fight Josh Burkman. The fight has been confirmed.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by DB
2008-09-04 18:02:02

And Phil, sorry to be an a$$ and correct you again, but it’s Hammil’s girlfriend who appeared in the countdown show. He had his daughter with his ex-wife.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by TheNegation
2008-09-04 19:10:45

Haha!! Everythin’s bull except Hammil’s wife!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by NameNotRequired
2008-09-04 11:54:01

Okami?! Better than everyone else in the division and the only one with a chance at Silva. He will get killed though.

 
 
Comment by markg
2008-09-04 08:29:02

sounds like he might be looking past kampmann, i don’t think he can get the win here, kampmann will win in what should be a good war…

 
Comment by frank
2008-09-04 08:32:55

so, you’re saying Leites “theoretically lost” that fight?
what?? are you kidding me?

Comment by UKmmaBOY
2008-09-04 08:58:42

Yep, same as Rashad lost if Tito didn’t hold the fence. Works the same way as MMA Maths!! Shoulda, woulda, coulda.

Comment by ViolentMike
2008-09-04 09:39:57

Rashad would have WON if Tito didn’t grab the fence.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ViolentMike
2008-09-04 09:40:41

Repeatedly.

 
Comment by UKmmaBOY
2008-09-04 09:51:17

Come on, it was only once or twice in EVERY clinch!!

 
Comment by RoB
2008-09-04 10:21:49

no he wouldn’t Mike.. Tito got a point deducted and it was a draw.. Tito might have won (which he did) if he hadn’t grabbed the fence.

 
Comment by Kimura by Fedor
2008-09-04 10:24:54

Tito was ahead in points, then got penalized, making the match a draw. It logically means that Tito would have won if he didn’t do that.

I think we all wish Rashad would have got a straight win.

 
Comment by ViolentMike
2008-09-04 10:47:29

NO NO. If Tito didn’t grab the fence over and over in the 2nd round, Rashad would have WON the round. Therefore, without the grabbing of the fence, Rashad would have won the 2nd round, which would have won him the fight.

 
Comment by b.w.
2008-09-04 11:37:39

no matter who anyone thinks technically should have won the fight it was clear as to who the better fighter was that night, and that was rashad.

 
Comment by john
2008-09-04 12:00:57

AS much as I dont like Rashad, he would have won that fight if Tito haden’t grabbed the fence. Not only do I think Rashad would have won, I think Rashad would have been fINISHED by Rashad.

I dont like Suga, but he owuld have won that fight for sure.

 
Comment by Psyqo78
2008-09-04 12:43:16

hell yeah if Rashad would have finished Rashad then of course Rashad would have won…. it is so clear now. lol

 
Comment by TheNegation
2008-09-04 19:12:46

Rashad is gonna get bombed by the Iceman 2 days from now nonetheless…I feel sorry for the guy.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Tony
2008-09-04 08:35:07

Silva won’t win Bisping like he did Irvin and Franklin! Cote is a fool he will get ko’d very fast.

 
Comment by blakemore
2008-09-04 08:41:09

Thales Leites didnt theoritically lose the fight he won it, the points taken off marquardt were fair in my opinion.
who knows what damage an illegal knee can do even if a fighter says he has recovered. the point taken for punching the back of the head was dodgy but it only makes up for the point which should have been taken off for his illegal pile-driver type manouvere.

would love to see a rematch tho.

Comment by TheNegation
2008-09-04 19:15:12

He theoretically lost the fight because NAte theoretically won the fight, plain and simple. That’s why it’s all theory. What if Nate didn’t have do all those point deductions, then he would have surely won the fight….And Thales is dodging Nate to avoid another beating, smart move. Who wants to get beaten up bt “The Great” anyway, hehe!!

 
 
Comment by RoB
2008-09-04 08:42:44

he f’in kneed Leites in the head and all kinds of different things that weren’t allowed.. I’m sorry but this guy Marquardt is getting on my nerves.. his standup is really bad and I hope Kampmann catches him and knocks him out cold which is what he deserves!

 
Comment by RandomTask
2008-09-04 09:07:12

He most definately DID beat Leites. By domination i might add, Leites did nothing, no damage at all to Marquardt.

 
Comment by WB
2008-09-04 09:15:09

Kampmann will win in a battle.

Maia is working with Wandi on his standup. Prob needs a few more fights before he can hang with the Spider, but I see him vs Anderson in ‘10. AND I’M TAKING MAIA!!!!

Purely speculative haha.

Comment by Jack
2008-09-04 10:54:05

Nate by piledriver!! lol

 
 
Comment by b.w.
2008-09-04 11:39:50

i like kampann to win. ive been on his bandwagon for a while now, so i hope he proves me right.

Comment by john
2008-09-04 12:01:45

B.W: I am with you brother. I think the smaller Kampman is going to LIght Marquardt up!

Comment by b.w.
2008-09-04 13:58:02

me too!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by belfort_fan
2008-09-04 13:33:26

I dont know who to call in this one… i kinda want kampman to win. i think its the other way around from what kampman said. i think marquardt may be alittle better on the feet. and kampman a bit better on the ground.

 
Comment by Wanderlei Fan
2008-09-04 13:44:28

I am surprised to see u say u want Kampman to win. I would love to see him win as well.

 
Comment by DB
2008-09-04 18:04:42

I have Marquardt in this fight. I think he’s bigger, stronger and faster then Kampman. I think they will be about even on the ground, Marquardt probibly has the wrestling advantage, and Kampman has the more technicaly sound striking, but Marquardt has the better power. I’ve got to go with Marquardt, but it could go either way. Fight of the nigh contender for sure!

 
Comment by Wanderlei Fan
2008-09-04 18:40:14

yea but Kampman has a great chin and can take a beating and come back from it as we saw with his fight with Drew Mcfederies.

 
Comment by belfort_fan
2008-09-04 21:33:47

Yeah marquardt will not knock kampman out.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post



Buy UFC Tickets

Support MMAmania.com

Burn this Feed!

Enter your email address:

Add to Google Add to My AOL



BlogBurst.com Add to Technorati Favorites

Site Sponsors

ufc 84 betting
 

Categories

Disclaimer

MMAmania.com is neither endorsed by nor affiliated with the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC). We are an independent news site devoted to the latest UFC headlines, rumors, gossip, fighter updates, and event previews and recaps. For entertainment purposes only.



 

ufc dvd



Upcoming MMA Events
Strikeforce Destruction
strikeforce destruction
Friday, November 21, 2008
HP Pavillion in San Jose, California
WEC 37
wec 37
Wednesday, December 3, 2008
Hard Rock Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas, Nevada
UFC Fight Night 16: “Fight for the Troops”
ufn16
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
Fort Bragg in Fayetteville, N.C.
The Ultimate Fighter (TUF) 8 Finale
tuf 8 finale
Saturday, December 13, 2008
The Pearl in Las Vegas, Nevada
UFC 92: THE ULTIMATE 2008
ufc 92
Saturday, December 27, 2008
MGM Grand Garden Arena in Las Vegas, Nevada.
UFC 93
ufc 93
Saturday, January 17, 2009
The O2 in Dublin, Ireland
UFC 94: St. Pierre vs. Penn 2
ufc 94
Saturday, January 31, 2009
MGM Grand in Las Vegas, Nevada
Affliction: Day of Reckoning
January, 2009
Anaheim, California