Comments on: UFC 82: Evan Tanner vs. Yushin Okami official

By: Miguel

Miguel — Sun, 02 Mar 2008 20:56:31 +0000

Pretty one sided fight Okami and Tanner, knock down first round and then KO with knee second round. Okami is one of the most best fighters flying under the radar.

By: JNC

JNC — Tue, 26 Feb 2008 02:11:28 +0000

What are anyone sthoughts on the best seats for this one, I have flr 3 Row D seats…

By: thefan

thefan — Fri, 01 Feb 2008 01:04:53 +0000

If Evan Tanner comes back in good condition and is back to his old self it’s going to be as long night for Okami.

By: belfort_fan

belfort_fan — Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:38:12 +0000

come on tanner you can do it

By: wowie

wowie — Mon, 28 Jan 2008 20:59:34 +0000

preditions anyone.

fitch will win
deigo will lose
arlovski will win
minatauro will win
kos will win
kongo will win
tanner will win

By: Spitforce

Spitforce — Mon, 28 Jan 2008 20:35:34 +0000

A lot has changed since tanner was dethrowned. I hope his liver is still up for it.

By: UFCAddict

UFCAddict — Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:45:13 +0000

I almost wish there was a 15 minute delay on all of the fights besides the title fight in this one. That way if a fight sucks, they could show us one of the exciting undercard fights instead. I hate when you’re watching a boring decision fight take place over a blood stained mat, and your left wondering: who got cracked open in the prelim fights.

By: mike22

mike22 — Mon, 28 Jan 2008 04:36:04 +0000

[quote comment="283384"]Tanner comes out and makes a statement again at 185. Okami’s “put me to sleep” style isn’t enough for the veteran. TKO stoppage, 2nd round.

Who’s next for Evan?

Michael Bisping, anyone?[/quote]

I completly agree with you on the tanner okami fight.

But Michael bisbing, yea right. who has bisbing beat? nobody!

who should the winner of okami vs tanner fight?

patrick cote should fight the winner, he has won 3 straight fights over tough guys. nobody else in the division has a two fight winning streak

To be honest i think cote should have fought okami and the winner of that would get a title shot. just my point of veiw.

Does anybody actualy think bisbing is gonna do good at 185?
i think hes gonna get owned by half the division!

By: Cool Hand Chad

Cool Hand Chad — Mon, 28 Jan 2008 03:45:39 +0000

Tanner comes out and makes a statement again at 185. Okami’s “put me to sleep” style isn’t enough for the veteran. TKO stoppage, 2nd round.

Who’s next for Evan?

Michael Bisping, anyone?

By: phatmac

phatmac — Mon, 28 Jan 2008 02:27:45 +0000

[quote comment="282238"][quote comment="282202"][quote comment="282026"]if they don’t air the Arlovski fight i’ll be pissed.[/quote]
I agree, this is a stacked card and I’m afraid we’re not going to see Andre, Kos, Fitch, Diego, and or Kongo? I’d like to see all of them. But since they’re running the Pitbull out, we won’t see him. Not sure if they’ll show Tanner/ Okami? Usually they only show 4-5 fights, so I don’t see how they’re going to show all the fan favorites.

Is there another pay per view in mid March?? UFC needs to slow down with these pay per views, and stop looking like WWE, Pay per view per month. Now since they raised the price to $44.95. These fighters would benefit with more UFC FN, for some exposure, and have each pay per view that much more better and special. Pay per views ought to be championship fights, #1 contender matches, and grudge matches. For having fighters due “debuts” I disagree. Look at Spider, they started him on a UFC fight night, whooped Leben, and went on to a championship main event pay per view. Stop hyping each event like the “Fight of the century” and make each card “Stacked” and what the fans really want since we’re paying for it. I’m not getting UFC 81, bc I hate how they hype up “Lumpy) Silvia as the “shit”, when all he does is lumps around.

Anyone agree/ disagree?????[/quote]

The more UFC events the better they have the most fighters and the best fighters in the world so the match ups are endless I love the way they mix in the fight night cards which are now mirror productions to the ppv’s. One ppv per month is perfect.

The fact that they raised thier prices is BS the economy is in a recesion If youre ganna pay an extra $5 then you should get to see an extra fight, Its not like there is any time constraints on ppv’s Dana if you expect me to cough up more money you need to televise another fight. Because if not I will go back to PPV pooling with friends or just get the recaps at MMAMania.com[/quote]
THEY NEED TO JUS MOVE PPVS TO 4 HOURS SO THEY CAN SHOW ALMOST THE WHOLE CARD…I MEAN LOOK AT THE MARCH 1ST CARD WERE GONNA MISS SOME DAMM GOOD MATCHES