Comments on: UFC Quick Quote: Sean Sherk calls BJ Penn a ‘punk’

By: Wrestler101

Wrestler101 — Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:27:52 +0000

I found your comment about Sherk having zero talent hilarious. All he does is take people down??? HAVE YOU EVER TRIED IT???IT IS FREAKING HARD! I have trained in MMA and wrestling for several years now, and takedowns take a tremendous amount of talent, strength, conditioning, and skill. I mean absolutely no disrespect, but if you find takedowns easy, I would like to see you fight. In conclusion, MR. Sherkk, please beat BJ Penn into a bloody pulp. Goodbye, Gentlemen.

By: Sean Sherk: BJ Penn is a ‘pothead’ at UFC blog for UFC news, results, videos, rumors, fights, pics and tickets — MMAmania.com

Wed, 26 Dec 2007 21:49:35 +0000

[...] Former UFC lightweight champion Sean Sherk ups the ante from “punk” status when he responds in kind to ongoing comments from BJ Penn that he is a “cheater” because he tested positive for steroids. Prior to the incident Sherk and Penn were on a collision course to duke it out inside the Octagon. Now we all have to settle for this back-and-forth name … good times. December 26th, 2007 [...]

By: Fightlinker » Blog Archive » Sean Sherk stuff

Fightlinker » Blog Archive » Sean Sherk stuff — Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:02:27 +0000

[...] But listen I did, because two days ago the Beatdown guys had Sean Sherk on the show and I wanted to hear if he was gonna act like a big baby regarding his stripped title. Unfortunately it was a big letdown … no new news, although Sherk did lie about the shit BJ Penn has been saying about him, claiming he hadn’t really heard about it when he’d already responded to it in another interview. Sherk, you fucking liar, you. [...]

By: The Anomaly

The Anomaly — Fri, 14 Dec 2007 09:31:00 +0000

[quote comment="233908"]bj by incredible takedown defense[/quote]
You know what you bring up a good point about take down defense.
Look at Hughes and Pierre, it was harder for Hughes to get Penn down then it was in GSP/Hughes I.
And then look at GSP’s take downs, he’s been able to take down anybody he wants, but who’s given him the most trouble? Penn. GSP took Sherk down in a violent football style tackle, no problem, took Hughes down the one time he tried(Hughes/GSP I), even though Hughes was able to get right back up. He even took Kos down with little to no resistance, but remember when he fought Penn, he had to press him up agaisnt the cage & work at it for like a solid minute, min and a half to get it, and in the 1st round he couldn’t even get it.
Sherk and stevenson alike, had better be working on there stand up, cuz if Penn wants, that’s where the fight is gona be.

By: Matt

Matt — Fri, 14 Dec 2007 06:57:25 +0000

bj by incredible takedown defense

By: James Smith

James Smith — Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:03:17 +0000

[quote comment="232166"]To all of you out there that are saying that Sherk could have naturally tested positive for 12 ng/ml of Nandrolone, consider this:

The Olympics have set a limit of 2 nanograms per ml of urine as the limit after which a test for nandro will be positive. This limit was based on testing done at the Nagano olympics where the HIGHEST level of nandro recorded was 0.2 ng/ml. The Olympics set the high level of 2 ng/ml to ensure that if there was a “freak of nature” then there was plenty of room for error.

So, among elite athletes from around the world competing at the highest possible level, the HIGHEST reading recorded was 0.2 ng/ml. This means that Sherk had 60 times the levels of the athlete who had the HIGHEST recorded reading among Olympic calibre athletes.

The limit of 6 ng/ml was set after further studies were conducted that suggested that the naturally occuring levels of nandro could possibly exceed the 2ng/ml level in elite athletes taking supplements and undergoing intense training 1 in every 10,000 times. These studies indicated that the absolute maximum levels that nandro could possibly reach naturally would be 6 ng/ml and the level was raised to this to ensure that there would be NO false positives.

Now that the science behind the numbers is in front of you, does anyone still want to argue that Sherk was clean?[/quote]
I never thought he was, but thanks for the info and education.

By: AzCombat

AzCombat — Thu, 13 Dec 2007 05:07:32 +0000

one fight in a couple years? oh yeah becuase sherk fights SOOOOOO MUCH i can’t even keep up with all his fights and title defenses he’s put on for us since october 2006.

By: Pat

Pat — Thu, 13 Dec 2007 04:48:36 +0000

[quote comment="231663"]that punk bitch bj is gonna get his ass fuckin pwned against sherk and all of you will finally see that he isnt that good and that sherk is the best 155 in the world. finally i wont have to hear about bj penn and people will realize that he really isnt that good and sherk is a bad mother fucker.this fight will end after the 2nd round once fat boy runs out of cardio and heart like always and sherk is still 100%.and if anyone thinks that his cardio comes from roids just watch his all acess,dudu is a machine. all this may not happen if fatboy cant beat stevenson,which i really wouldnt doubt it if he dosent it[/quote]

LOL. Steroids is not something you take, then sit on your ass while it takes effect. Steroids is exactly what someone takes to make them train like a maniac.

By: rthomp

rthomp — Thu, 13 Dec 2007 04:21:03 +0000

bj vs ken flo

By: rthomp

rthomp — Thu, 13 Dec 2007 04:20:32 +0000

[quote comment="231424"]Someone sounds a little upset…maybe it’s the roid rage.[/quote]
bj should be fighting kenny!